I
believe that this name anti-music was originally a term tending to use irony or
mockery to represent the negativism of some musical compositions of the 20rh
century. It was also a term discussed in a music web site called antimusic. As
far as I can tell the name originally came from a coined term in the book Broken
Record: The Inside Story of the Grammy Awards by Henry Schipper. Schipper recounts in this book that the
Academy and their awards program were initially set up as the old-line music
biz’s answer to the growth of Rock n’ Roll, a form of music they considered
“Anti-Music”. Perhaps another way
to look at the meaning of this word is to consider it any form of music that
defies convention to such a degree that some people would not recognize it as
musical or a legitimate music genre.
Perhaps a better understanding of this term would be any form of music
intended to overthrow traditional conventions and expectations. Some other related considerations of
anti-music could possibly be anti-genre music or noise-music.
Noise-music
is a form of so-called music that some would consider to be the “expressive”
use of noise or distortion within the context of what the composer or arranger
considers to be “music” or “anti-music” music. This type of composition
challenges the distinction between musical and non-musical sound. It is
directly related to the 20th century philosophy off the destruction
of music absolutes.
Where
am I heading with this discussion? The
purpose is not to get entangled in the controversy over whether anti-music is
music or not. The purpose of this very
brief mention of anti-music it to point out that it was not developed by God
fearing Christian musicians who were desiring to worship God with a genera of music
that negated the elements of traditional Western music. Therefore, it is misguided for a Church
musician to entangle public worship with such styles of music. Such entanglement is one of Satan’s
stratagems for squeezing religious music into the world’s mold.
No comments:
Post a Comment