The Serugin, Te’amim, and Meturgeman in
Christian Perspective-part 13
The
lack of Masorete knowledge of these graphic signs brings the theory of the te’amim being of Masoretic origin into
serious question. The result of this
confusion seems to have caused Christian Bible exegetes and historians to
become silent about the origin, meaning and relevance of these graphic signs or
consideration of them being a precise, or any kind of musical notation for that
matter. I know that since we “see
through a glass darkly” we do not have perfect or complete knowledge of these
ancient symbols found above and below the OT manuscripts, but surely Christian
scholars should care about these ancient signs above and below the OT Texts
enough to at least retain them in their usable knowledge of OT Scripture. Is this a testimony that Christian scholars
ignore what they do not know or understand?
Should they not be curious about the great volume of writings that over
the centuries have considered the accentuation of OT Scripture to be valuable?
There
has been general agreement among authors, especially those who wrote from the
time of the Talmud, that all of the entire Tanakh was intended to be sung. A plausible hypothesis is that part or all of
the purpose of the serugin abbreviated
texts was to insure accurate intoning of Scripture. Furthermore, it seems
possible that the Karaites believed that this “wall around the Torah” could
only accurately be accomplished if they were in some way able keep the original
melodies that accompanied the Holy Writ from being vilified in any manner. This was no doubt accomplished by the
accurate precise notation provided above and below the texts of the entire
Hebrew OT which were possibly protected for Levite use in the abbreviated manuscripts. The fact that the Bible manuscripts were
abbreviated attests to the fact that they had to be used by someone who had
practically memorized the OT Texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment