Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Aesthetics and the Christian Musician Part 7

Aesthetics and the Christian musician-Part 7
            No one before Schoenberg had ever been successful in completely negating the traditional way of “knowing” when it came to music composition.  What musicians most often fail to recognize that Schoenberg’s dodecaphonic invention was deeply ingrained in philosophy.  He intended to defy the philosophy that there was profundity in harmonic practice.  To him nothing about music was profound.  To Schoenberg nothing mattered in music but the composer’s free will. 
            To Schoenberg the only rules or standards of music that mattered were those rules and standards that the composer imposed upon himself.  To him the only thing that mattered about how a composer arranged the building blocks of music was the composers self actualized rules of how he wished to arrange the building blocks of music.
            The purpose of all this discussion of progressive despair is to show logically how 20th century musical philosophy prepared the way for the autonomous philosophical practice of contemporary Christian musicians.  It is easy to see how the inordinate quest for music freedom of the world in the 20th  century strongly molded the autonomous freedom philosophy of contemporary Christian musicians.
            The parallels are astonishing.  Both believe that music aesthetic is totally a matter of personal opinion.  Both believe that rhythm and dissonance are extremely vital to their music.  Both believe that the only artistic standards in music composition are those which the artist imposes on himself.  Both believe that the composer and the performer are autonomous.  The godless worldly composers are not interested in what God thinks about music and the worldly Christian musicians are not interested in a philosophical belief that God thinks about the music part of music.

No comments:

Post a Comment