Is All Music Created Equal? Part 1
Writers
like Greg Scheer claim that they are not interested in the musical style
debate, but every musician whom I have had the privilege or knowing or reading
their books or articles about music who mention music styles have taken a
position on styles of music. Even the writers who have decided not to decide have
in reality taken a position on musical style because they have come to the
faulty pluralistic conclusion that everyone’s music is equal. So, when Scheer made the statement, “I take
the position that ‘all musics are created equal’” The Art of Worship, by Greg Scheer, pp. 11-12 it stands to reason
that he definitely, by that statement, chose to enter the style debate. As a musician, surely he does not really
believe that all creative music efforts are equal. If one were to ask him if the music of J.S.
Bach was equal to my compositions that I wrote for my undergraduate music
theory class, I am sure that he would vote for Bach. What he was doubtlessly meaning at the time
he wrote his book was that when one is referring to religious music, the music
part of the music does not matter.
I am well aware that if a writer does not take a cosmopolitan view that
is a liberal pluralistic view of music style, he or she runs the risk of being
considered to be “out of touch”, “musically bigoted”, or at least to have been
“hiding under a rock” philosophically.
It seems a bit strange that at the same time a writer may believe in a
prescriptive approach to secular music without receiving the same labels and accusations.
Various writers who have addressed secular music in the late twentieth and
early twenty first centuries have devoted much of their writings to the belief
that the music part of all music matters without being accused of stifling
creative efforts
No comments:
Post a Comment