What Kind of Music Did
Charles and John Wesley Use? Part 3
It
should be pointed out that when a composer utilizes fresh new melodies and harmonies
with religious music it is not an indication that there is anything
inappropriate or incongruent. On the contrary, old melodies do not
automatically indicate that they are classic or of a high quality. New melodies and harmonies do not indicate
that this music is inappropriate, incongruent of a poor quality. The answer is not found philosophically or
musically in the “old versus new argument” or the “secular versus sacred”
argument but rather in wise usage of both.
It shouldn’t take much discernment or a doctor’s degree in music
composition, for a worship leader to come to an understanding that some music
does not lend itself to congruent use with music that a congregation of
believers is using to bring honor and glory to an awesome triune God.
The fact
that the Wesleys used new melodies, old melodies or borrowed melodies from
previous secular usage is not the issue.
Several things are especially important when one makes use of
eclecticism in music. First, a Christian
musician must be aware of a melodies close association with music that was
antichrist in its previous enactment. (The philosophical issue is not always
how many people in a worshiping congregation know the meaning of this music in
its original enactment, but rather an intellectual honesty about connecting the moral nature of God with
former ribald themes.) Second, a
Christian musician must be constantly aware of whether or not this borrowed
music is congruent or incongruent with the message of the gospel of our Lord
and Savior Jesus Christ. Third,
Christians must be knowledgeable enough of music composition to discern if it
does or does not lend itself to being used to represent the moral nature of
God. God is high and holy and is worthy of being worshiped with music that will
bring honor to His holiness.
No comments:
Post a Comment