A Unified Field of Knowledge –part 3
Synthesis thinking church musicians, who
were in many instances, graduates of Christian colleges and seminaries began to
think that if it was okay to love the world system then it was okay to love the
world’s music. Philosophically they
believed that the answer could no more be based on good music and bad music,
music appropriate for worship, or music which is not appropriate for
worship. The philosophical notion that
all styles are equal gave rise to the belief that the musical answer must always
be somewhere between truth and error. As
this synthesis philosophical thinking began to develop these musicians became
full-ledged pluralists.
Now in the twenty-first century,
somewhere between music that is best suited to fit the awesomeness and
solemnity of public worship of the high and holy Trinity and music that is not suited
for Christian worship are styles of music that are now inappropriately
appropriate. Since the answer must be a
synthesis answer, the answer must be taking music that was created to fulfill
the lust of the flesh and squeezing this music into a worship mode. To accomplish this, synthesis thinking
Christian musicians have to find styles
of music that are basically created anti-Christ, anti-worship (of God),
anti-trust, anti-purity, anti-beauty, anti-rest, anti-authority, anti-family,
and amalgamate it with the gospel message and when this is accomplished,
“presto-chango” they have the perfect worship style.
No comments:
Post a Comment