Although I developed the charts in
today’s blog years ago, I still get blessed when I study Levite administration and organization
utilized in the Ancient Temple in Israel.
Music of the Bible, Christian Music Philosophy, Church Music, Music Education, Christian Music Education
Saturday, February 28, 2015
Levite Administration in the Bible-part 4
THE MUSICIANS' ADMINISTRATIVE CHAIN OF COMMAND
Not
only were the Levite musicians of the First Temple set in order by lofty
authority, they were also placed in a categories according to rank which was
called musicians of the first and second degree. I Chronicles 15:16-24 gives this organization
as follows in Table A.
TABLE
A
First
and Second Degree Musicians
I.
|
Musicians of the First Degree
1. Heman --- his brethren
2. Asaph --- his brethren
3. Ethan
(Jeduthun) --- his brethren
|
II.
|
Musicians of the Second Degree
1. Zechariah 8.
Benaiah
2. Ben 9. Maaseiah
3. Jaaziel 10.
Mattitihiah
4. Shemiramoth 11.
Eliphelah
5. Jehiel 12. Mikneiah
6. Unni 13. Obededom
7. Ellab 14. Jaiel
|
Not only were the various musicians given a rank in the chain of
command, but they were also given a function and appointment as shown in Table
B below.
TABLE B
Job
Descriptions of the Levite Musicians
I.
|
Singers or
conductors - to sound (shama - to call together carefully) with
cymbals (metseleth - double tinklers)
of brass (nechosneth - brass or bronze).
Note: These singers were used
as "conductors" of music.
Idelsohn says that the cymbals were not employed in the music proper,
but rather to mark (beginnings) pauses and intermissions.2
|
II.
|
Psaltery players - (nebel - a harp-like instrument with
a resonant body) players on alamoth
(soprano part-hence an octave higher).
a. Zechariah e.
Unni
b. Aziel f. Eliab
c. Shemiramoth g.
Maaseiah
d. Jehiel h. Benaiah
|
III.
|
Harp players - (kinnor - a small lyre) players on Sheminith
(eighth or octave) to excel (to
glitter, i.e. for brilliance).
a. Mattithiah d.
Obededom
b. Elipeiah e.
Jeiel
c.
Mikneiah f. Azaaiah
|
IV.
|
Song Instructors - Chenaniah was
chief of Levites. I Chronicles 15:22
could read: And Chenaniah accomplished
and became a head person or steward of the Levites (and) was burdened or
(had) mental desire for song, the burden of song in as much as he
accomplished to perceive (or) distinguish mentally.
|
V.
|
Porters and
Doorkeepers - (doorkeepers or porters) vs. 23 Berechiah, the
father of Asaph and Elkanah; vs. 24
Obededom, a musician of the second degree; and Hehiah. Also porters however, some of 1, 2, and 3
above were players.
|
VI.
|
Signaling priests - vs. 24 priests
who sounded the chatsotserah - the silver trumpet. Those priests were not musicians and the
chatsotserah was a sounding instrument, not a melodic musical instrument.
|
Friday, February 27, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
One thing keeps surfacing when one
studies Levite music administration on the Bible—ancient Levite musicians did
not seem to have trouble taking orders from their superiors.
Levite Administration in the Bible-part 3
Levite
Administration in the Bible-part 3
The
Levite ministering musicians of the First Temple were under appointment. It
appears that these chief Levite musicians were chosen by a committee including
musicians and non-musicians much like ministers of music are chosen today. However, the chief Levite musicians were
"set" (amad 5975) or chosen
by a very authoritative "committee."
II Chronicles 29:25 states, "And he set Levites in the house of the
LORD with cymbals, with psalteries, and with harps, according to the
commandment (mitzvah 4687) of David,
and of Gad the king's seer, and Nathan the prophet: for so was the commandment of the LORD by his
prophets. Note that the A.V. margin
says, "By the hand of the LORD, by the hand of his prophets." So, the appointment of these chief musicians
was so important that they were selected by:
1. David who was God's anointed King.
2. Gad the king's seer (melek 4428) who was a beholder of visions of God.
3. Nathan who was a naba (5030) or inspired prophet.
4. The hand of Jehovah the self-existent
eternal God.
Perhaps this august
"committee" was necessary since these Levite musicians were separated
to be naba or prophets who would
prophesy with music.
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
Although we do not understand the significance
of all the organization that surrounding music making in the ancient Jewish Temple,
one thing is certain: their musicing was highly organized and the musicians
could and did work as a ministering team.
Levite Administration in the Bible-part 2
Levite
Administration in the Bible-part 2
Although
we do not know all the significance of the order and organization imposed on
the Levite musicians, we do know from Scripture that they were accustomed to a
high degree of organization. I
Chronicles 6:32-48 tells us of some of that organization when it states in
verse thirty-two, "And they ministered before the dwelling place of the
tabernacle of the congregation with singing, until Solomon had built the house
of the LORD in Jerusalem: and they
waited on their office according to their order (misphat 4941)." Misphat means a formal decree giving
this statement the import that their placement was of importance to the program
of organization.
Verses
thirty-three to forty-four tell us that Heman the singer stood in the middle
and Asaph stood on his right side and Ethan on his left. Evidently they stood in their respective
positions with their sons or brethren (vs. 33 and 44). We are not informed as to why they stood in
this order, but it was important enough for the chronicler to record. I Chronicles 16:5 also gives a list of
the order and chain of command of the Levite musicians. "Asaph the chief (ro’sh7218), and next (mishneh
4932) to him Zechariah, Jeiel, and Shemiramoth, and Jehiel, and Mattithiah, and
Eliab, and Benaiah, and Obededom: and
Jeiel with psalteries and with harps; but Asaph made a sound with
cymbals." This example shows their
rank. Asaph was chief and the rest were
"next" or mishneh which
means of the second rank. Note that this
organization specified that the Levites of second rank would play melodic
musical instruments (nebel, 5035 and kinnowr, 3658) and that Asaph the
conductor would sound (shama 8085) or
direct (mark beginnings and pauses) with the cymbals (metseleth 4700).
Wednesday, February 25, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
I am surprised that so many parents
are upset with the music that their children like and perform when they took
them to the “Philistines” to receive their musical training.
Levite Administration in the Bible-part 1
Levite
Administration in the Bible-part 1
Without
doubt the most impressive part of ancient Levite music administration in the
First Temple was the Levite teacher-scholar relationship recorded in I
Chronicles 25:1-31. As we can see from
the Biblical Record in the twenty-fifth chapter of First Chronicles these
Levites were separated into three groups under Asaph, Jeduthun, and Heman. Under Asaph were four lots, each having
eleven scholars under each teacher.
Jeduthun was responsible for six lots each having a teacher responsible
for eleven scholars. Finally Heman had
placed under him fourteen lots each consisting of a teacher and eleven
students. So, Asaph's four lots accounted
for forty-eight musicians, Jeduthun's six lots accounted for seventy-two
musicians, and Heman's fourteen lots accounted for one hundred sixty-eight
musicians making a total of 288 teachers and scholars as recorded in I
Chronicles 25:7.
It
should be pointed out that the Israelites accepted the responsibility of
training their own church musicians. The
Chief Levites and their sons were not only performers and ministers, but they
were also teachers and they passed their art along to others. The Bible example is very clear that the
church is responsible to educate its own musicians. The ancient Hebrews would never have even
thought of sending their sons to the Philistines, the Egyptians, the Sumerians,
or the Akkadians. They accepted the
responsibility to personally prepare each succeeding generation of Israelite
musicians. Under this developed system
of music education, music in the Temple reached a very high level of
excellence.
Tuesday, February 24, 2015
Thought for the Day-part 4
Thought
for the Day-part 4
Part of the changes that the new birth
spiritually will bring about in our lives will be some changes in our
musicing. Is there anything about the
music that you listen to and perform that would hinder your spiritual life? As
we mentioned yesterday, on this Easter Sunday we should all seek to remove any
music that is not compatible with a whole-life philosophy that is
Christocentric.
The New Song-part 4
The
New Song-part 4
Today is Easter Sunday, the day that we celebrate Christ's
resurrection. Because He paid the price
for the sins of the whole world, you and I are able to be a new creature in
Christ Jesus and ipso facto can truly have a new song to sing. When we study
new song in the Bible we learn that the words "new song" do not refer
to a new composition but rather to a song of a higher or renovated
character. Psalm 40:1-3 identifies what
the term new song means. It states,
"I waited patiently for the Lord, and he inclined unto me, and heard my
cry. He brought me up out of a horrible
pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and established my
goings. And he hath put a new song in my
mouth, even praise unto our God: many shall see it and fear, and shall trust in
the LORD." There are several observations of this Scripture passage to be
made that will influence our philosophical beliefs about the "new
song" of the Bible...
First, note that the word even is in italics in the A.V. which means that
it is not found in the Hebrew text. So,
we learn that the chadash (2319) shiyr (7892) is without doubt tehilah
(8416) Elohiym (430) i.e. "a new song of praise to God". The song of the "new man" is
different than the song of the "old man" who was dead in trespasses
and sins. The Christian musician who is
a new creature in Christ Jesus has a new song which is of a renovated
character. The psalmist's new life
brought about a song of praise to God.
He performed music in a "new key", so to speak. When he passed from death to life spiritually
had a new song, a new theme, a new "tune" and a new purpose in his
musicing. Why? Because his music philosophy had changed
since he became different on the inside.
(In our dispensation the new man is truly "born again".)
Second, it appears that the psalmist David was writing of the time when
God brought him out of the pit of sin (or noise) and established him musically
and spiritually. The Cambridge scholars
put the words "a pit of noise" in the margin. Note that Elohiym the supreme God had to lift the
musician out of a pit of noise before he could establish (kuwn 3559) the musician's goings (ashur 838). Also note that
the God had to remove the uproar or
noise that surrounded the musician ( yaven
-3121 tiyt -2916) with dregs that
swept him away i.e. hindered or held him down spiritually. I believe that the sense and import of this
statement is that he had to change the psalmists' music before he could
establish him spiritually.
Monday, February 23, 2015
Thought for the Day--part 3
Thought
for the Day--part 3
Have you ever considered why some
Christian musicians cling so desperately to music styles that represents the
"old life" of undegenerated man?
One of the best ways to break away from the "old life" of sin
is to sing a new song! Tomorrow is
Easter Sunday. It is the day that represents Christ's victory over sin. It is a day of re-beginning. Why not establish a re-beginning of your
music listening habits if they have a tendency to defeat you spiritually.
The New Song-part 3
The
New Song-part 3
It matters how a Christian presents
the "New song" which is mentioned in the Bible. What many Christian
musicians have forgotten is that direction determines destiny. If you start west on I 70 from Indianapolis
Indiana in the USA, you will not arrive in Columbus, Ohio, no matter how much
you desire to go there because you are going the wrong direction. Getting a crowd’s attention by emphasizing
the flesh will by no means draw them to Christ.
If a performer maximizes the physical, by doing so he or she minimizes
the spiritual. If a performer sings
religious music and at the same time draws attention to the flesh, he or she
will get a message across to the audience, but it will not be the "new
song" of the gospel. The reason one
cannot successfully sell sacred things with the sensual is that it just won’t
work. Galatians 6:6-9 states: Let him that is taught in the word communicate unto him that teacheth in
all good things. Be not deceived; God is
not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that
soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption: but he that soweth to
the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. And let us not be weary in well doing: for in
due season we shall reap, if we faint not.
God’s ways are higher than the ways of the world. The "new
song" of the Bible always takes the high road. The world uses man’s depraved nature and
man’s natural sexual appetite to sell its music. Why can’t Christians take advantage of man’s
depraved nature and his natural sexual appetite for that matter to present the
good news of the gospel?
One of the reasons is that as Galatians 5:17 explains, “For the flesh
lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are
contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye
would.” The Galatian writer makes it
very clear that the flesh and the spirit are contrary one to the other. Therefore it is deceitful to gain people's
attention with sexual innuendos and then present the "new song" which
is the life-changing gospel of Jesus Christ.
The Bible teaches that the flesh and the spirit are not compatible. It is a mystery to me that so many Christian
musicians are determined to try to present the "New song" and the
lust of the flesh side by side as a team of horses. Placing the flesh and the spirit side by side
is like placing a lion and a lamb in the same harness. If one does, there is no doubt about it, the
lion will eat the lamb.
Sunday, February 22, 2015
Thought for the Day-part 2
Thought
for the Day-part 2
Is there any difference between the
music you listened too and performed before you were born again and the music
you have in your life today.
The New Song--part 2
The
New Song--part 2
The concept of “new song” in the
Bible connotes music making that is of a higher or renovated character that
always renders praise to God--not man.
II Corinthians 5:17 states, “Therefore if any man be in Christ, he is a
new creature: old things are passed away: and behold all things are become
new.” A part of the old things that pass
away is the “old song” and the old self-aggrandizement and worldly musical
performance practice.
If the essence of a musician’s
music making is the presentation of self, then God cannot receive the
preeminence. The new man, singing
"new song", in a new way, seeks to exalt Christ not self. As we know, in the new song of the Bible, God
receives all the praise all the time. If
our performance practice results in the lifting up of self and the performer’s
talents, then the musician’s performance becomes merely religious music rather
than sacred music. Remember, in the
beginning God created music for His honor and His glory.
Earlier we discussed ownership of
music and were drawn to the conclusion that we do not own it. Why?
Because music is God's creation, he holds the deed to its
ownership. So, since we are singing and
playing HIS SONG, we relinquish the sense of ownership. When we were dead in
trespasses and sins, as musicians, we thought we owned OUR music. We were autonomous when it came to OUR music
praxis. At least we acted like we were a
law to ourselves when we performed OUR music.
We sang OUR own song which was what I call "old song". There is something wonderful about singing
HIS song in HIS sanctuary for HIS glory.
Saturday, February 21, 2015
Thought for the Day- part 1
Thought
for the Day- part 1
It should be no mystery that after a
Christian's" new birth" spiritually he or she will have a "new
song” because this person has a new heart and is a "new creature in Christ
Jesus".
The New Song-part 1
The
New Song-part 1
The words "new song" are mentioned in the Bible nine
times. In the Old Testament they are
recorded six times in the Book Of Psalms (33:3, 40:3, 96:1, 98:1, 144:9, and
149:1) and once in Isaiah 42:10. In the
New Testament, new song is found only in the Book of Revelation 5:9 and
14:2. Philosophers have not said much
about the biblical principle of new song and I have never read after any music
philosopher who even mentioned it.
Writers on church music most often misunderstand these references and
use them as proof texts to support the idea of contemporary Christian
music. Others suppose them to mean that
we are commanded to compose new musical compositions. Often in my music of the Bible class students
have queried, "Are we required to write and perform new songs?"
There certainly is a continuing need for new music literature to meet
the needs of the church today. It is
also a fact that if Christian musicians do not perform this new music, it will
not get performed. I am convinced that
God is pleased when his "chief musicians" compose and arrange new
music that follows Bible principles of musicing. However I am convinced that these Bible
references To "New Song" do not connote musical compositions that are
"new" in relation to time. These
verses in the Bible have a different meaning and we will be discussing this
meaning in the next few blog posts.
Friday, February 20, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
Christian music educators often tend
to forget that they are not the lone source of knowledge and training of the
elementary music students in their classes.
Music Education and the “Big Picture”.
Music Education and the “Big
Picture”.
Charles
Hoffer once stated, “Music teachers are never completely alone in their work,
even though they may be the only teacher of music in a particular school.” Introduction to Music Education, Charles Hoffer, Wadsworth Pub. Co., 1993, p.54. This is certainly true of the music educator
in a Christian school. I have often
reminded music education students in my classes that the Christian music
teacher must become a part of the “Big Picture” of a Christin school. Not only should we have allied arts but also
allied education at large in the Christian school curriculum.
The
music educator should look for ways to connect music content to the other areas
of academics. Francis Schaeffer believed
that, “We tend to study all our disciplines in unrelated parallel lines.” Escape From Reason,
InterVarsity Press, Francis Schaeffer, 1968, p. 12. Music teachers have a tendency to isolate
themselves from the educational process going on all the way round them. Probably the wisest choice that new music
educators can make is to endear themselves to the other staff and faculty
members of the Christian school. The new
music teacher will soon find out that there is comfort and strength in the comradery
of community.
Thursday, February 19, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought for the Day
Quality elementary music education should not be modeled
after Senior High and College performing groups.
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
I
am simply amazed when I think about the fact that I grew up on an eighty acre
farm in Eastern Kansas and was the most unlikely person to have had the
wonderful opportunities to share my music ministry with thousands of people in ninety
seven different countries. Praise God!
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Quality Christian Elementary Music Education
Quality Christian
Elementary Music Education
One of the problems that will often
confront the elementary music educator who is new on the job is the fact that a
Christian schools totally public relations oriented to the detriment of quality
music education. I am not saying that a
performance driven music program is a completely incorrect praxis. However, if public relations programs are the
tail that constantly wags the dog, quality music education will suffer.
One way
to evaluate the situation is to find out if October, November, and December are
completely taken up with producing a Christmas program and if February, March,
and April are totally consumed with producing an Easter program. No quality music education curriculum will be
able to survive six month of the nine month school year being swallowed with
two music programs. Elementary music
performance is important, but there is much more involved in educating children
musically than music and dramatic musical performances.
How I Began This Philosophical Journey
How
I Began This Philosophical Journey
In July of the summer of 1967 I
attended the Eastern Kansas Camp with my mother Anna Mayme Wolf who has now
gone to heaven. The evangelist was Dr. C.E. Cowen who preached a very powerful
lucid gospel message. Dr. John I. Page came to me and invited me to step
forward and give my heart to the Lord. I came forward that night and bowed at
an old wooden alter in that open air tabernacle. I was tired of trying to
control my life. I confessed my sins
with much godly sorrow; gave my heart to the Lord Jesus Christ and, and by
faith in the merits of Christ, received the Lord Jesus Christ as my personal Savior.
I later graduated from Pittsburg State University in Pittsburg Kansas and accepted a teaching position at Kansas City College and Bible School in Overland Park Kansas. I believe it was during my first year of teaching that I attended a music seminar by Dr. Frank Garlock which took place at Kansas City Christian School in Merriam Kansas.
It was during Dr. Garlock’s seminar that the Lord impressed upon my heart to engage in serious study of music found in the Bible and to develop a coherent and congruent Christ centered music philosophy. I will forever be grateful to Dr. Garlock for his faithfulness to the Lord during that seminar. Without his faithfulness to deliver the message of Christ centered musicing I might not have started on this marvelous musical journey.
I later graduated from Pittsburg State University in Pittsburg Kansas and accepted a teaching position at Kansas City College and Bible School in Overland Park Kansas. I believe it was during my first year of teaching that I attended a music seminar by Dr. Frank Garlock which took place at Kansas City Christian School in Merriam Kansas.
It was during Dr. Garlock’s seminar that the Lord impressed upon my heart to engage in serious study of music found in the Bible and to develop a coherent and congruent Christ centered music philosophy. I will forever be grateful to Dr. Garlock for his faithfulness to the Lord during that seminar. Without his faithfulness to deliver the message of Christ centered musicing I might not have started on this marvelous musical journey.
Tuesday, February 17, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought for the Day
The music scales of the Bible and the music
scale of Ugarit findings have all proven to be much more like the scales of
music of our modern church music than many church musicians have been led to
believe.
Ancient Precise Musical Notation
Ancient
Precise Musical Notation
If
you would like to locate the ancient Canaanite city called Ugarit it is easy to
find on a Bible map. If you will look at the eastern tip of Cyprus it is pointing
toward Ugarit. This ancient city found in northern Syria, which is now called
Ras Shamra, is of importance for those who study music in the Old Testament.
The music which has been discovered on clay tablets in that ancient city has
helped musicologists to understand the construction and meaning of ancient
music around the 12th century BC. This
music which was written in cuneiform symbols on clay tablets has been valuable
to musicologists in making a connection to ancient Syrian music with the music
of the Bible.
Why
would a student of music in the Bible care about a connection or likeness of
the music of the Old Testament i.e. the psalmodic and prosodic musical scale
systems and the Ugaritic cuneiform notation system? Although a thorough discussion of the
likenesses of the three ancient scale systems is too involved for this tiny
blog post it deserves mention. Although
none of these ancient scale systems function like the tonal music of the
Occident, they were basically heptatonic, diatonic scales. The Ugaritic scale proved to be a seven note
diatonic scale with half-steps between the third and fourth degrees and the
seventh and eighth degrees. Some of the
Ugaritic music also contained a harmony part.
Monday, February 16, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
It
seems strange to me that so many of the scholarly teams who translated the
Bible in the twentieth century failed to include a qualified musicologist.
TERMS IN THE PSALMS—part 2
TERMS
IN THE PSALMS—part 2
After
reading scores of author’s opinions on the technical terms in the Psalms, it
has become apparent that many of them failed to support their arguments with
significant word study, historical fact, linguistic considerations, or even
ancient extra-Biblical literature. Many
of the commentators appeared to be non-musicians who were determined to give
each word in the psalm headings a significant musical definition. After studying the inscriptions at length and
after using the various word study helps available today, it has become clear
that not every term should be understood in a musical sense.
Throughout
the last two hundred years, it has been customary to believe that the obscure
sayings in the psalm headings were the words or tune names of popular secular
songs of the ancient Hebrew culture.
Also, the various writers have tended to believe that the chief
musicians used tunes of secular ditties, love songs, and folk ballads, etc. to
sing the psalms. As has been discussed
in this blog and in my book Music of the
Bible in Christian Perspective, Susanne Haik-Vantoura's deciphering of the
melodies of the Psalms from the te'amim has now produced evidence that all of
the Psalms had their own melodies which were composed by the various
psalmists. Therefore, there was no
reason for the chief musician to have used the melodies of the popular songs of
the day, and furthermore, this notion is completely without factual or
scholarly basis.
Furthermore,
it has been found after careful study that a logical explanation for several of
the obscure sayings in the psalm headings may be found in the content of the
psalms in which they appear--an observation that all too few writers have
made. Many of the terms are engulfed in
a plethora of confusion created by a multitude of conjectures of hundreds of
authors over the last two hundred years.
In my writings on the Book of Psalms I have purposely tried to spare the
reader the hassle of reading through these often strange and exotic conjectures
of authors.
Sunday, February 15, 2015
Thought for the Day
Thought
for the Day
Many Christian musicians do not study the technical
terms used Book of Psalms because they are only interested in spiritual
meanings. However, they fail to realize
that many times an understanding of these terms will shed much light on the
meaning of the Psalm in question.
TERMS IN THE PSALMS—part 1
TERMS
IN THE PSALMS—part 1
I
believe that it is valuable to study the technical terms mentioned in the Book
of Psalms. Although exhaustive lists of
the technical terms used in the psalter may not be of much help to those who
read the Psalms, an understanding of what these terms mean is very valuable to
all who read and study the Psalms.
Students of the Palms should understand that these words can only be
defined and discussed in reference to the various author's opinions concerning
their meaning in Scripture.
Presentations
of where these terms appear in the Psalter have little significance except that
it a logical approach to their presentation since most of the words have no
interconnection with each other. If the
student of the Book of Psalms would like to study these terms in an exhaustive
manner, The New Englishman's Hebrew
Chaldee Concordance will be most helpful in such an endeavor. Also, I would like to point out that there
are literally hundreds of works written on the psalms, many of which cover the
same material. The following works were
helpful to me in developing the definitions of terms in the psalms found in
this chapter. They are:
1. Theological Word Book of the Old Testament.
2. Theological Dictionary of the Old
Testament.
3. The New Brown-Driver-Briggs-Gesenius
Hebrew-English Lexicon.
4. An Expository Dictionary of Old
Testament words.
5. Analytical Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon
of the Old Testament.
6. The New Englishman's Hebrew and Chaldee
Concordance.
7. Gesenius' Hebrew and Chaldee Lexicon.
Saturday, February 14, 2015
Thought for the Day-worship part 13
Thought
for the Day-worship part 13
When Moses and Joshua were returning
from Mt. Sinai, they observed, "...the noise of them that sing do I
Hear." (Exodus 32: 18b) We need to
make sure that today, as God hears our musicing in Sunday morning worship, he
doesn't have to say, "The noise of them that sing do I hear."
The Role of Music in Worship-part 13
The
Role of Music in Worship-part 13
We all know that we are commanded many times in the Bible to praise the
Lord. That is sufficient reason to
engage in praise as we music unto God.
Robert Weber gives three benefits of praising God. “First, praise is
always associated with the presence of God.”
“Second, praise testifies.”
“Third, praise has the power to deliver us.” (Robert Weber, Enter His
Courts With Praise. Hendrickson Books,
1997, pp. 22-23). As we mentioned in an
earlier post, we do not worship God for what we get out of worship. We don’t sing unto God for some kind of
spiritual high. However, since God
inhabits our musical praise [see Psalm 22:3], we do often receive as we give
our musical offering.
Earlier in our music worship posts we mentioned that the musician has to
resist the urge to worship music rather than actually worshiping God as we
music. Michael Marshall stated, “The
instinct to worship, as surely as any other instinct in our lives, needs to be
directed if it is not to become corrupted.”
(Michael Marshall, Renewal In Worship. Marshall, Morgan & Scott, U.K., 1982. P.
3.)
The 32nd chapter of Exodus is a prime
O.T. example of misdirected worship. The children of Israel were worshiping in
a manner somewhat like their neighboring nations worshiped. This new form of worship seemed, to these
misguided worshipers, to be the thing to do.
They sang, but that wasn’t exotic enough, so they danced. In their misguided worship, the worship
leader Aaron added a third dimension that was even more exotic—he decided that
they should dance naked as they sang their noise based music (see vss. 18 &
25).
Oh yes, I forgot to mention that he also added a golden calf as the
object of their exotic worship music!
Remember that they were only musicing in worship the way their worldly
neighbors worshiped. They hadn’t
invented anything new that had not already been done by the heathen nations
that surrounded them. The ancient
Hebrews were merely musicing in the same manner that others worshipers musiced. They were simply utilizing the “fine art” of
dance in their worship like many of the other nations that surrounded them
danced to a plethora of gods. I think
you get the point, and if you don’t, a few more paragraphs probably wouldn’t
help much.
So, out of all the previous discussion, learn to guard your heart, your
worship motives, and your time honored forms of musical worship that were given
to you by your forefathers. Do not become discouraged or embarrassed because
your church does not worship with trendy noise based styles of music or hire
some dancers to make public worship look current or trendy. Furthermore, be thankful that your fellowship
of believers sings an occasional (meaningful) gospel song or even a hymn or
two. Remember that the Bible instructs
believers that although we are in the kosmos (2889) we do not have to become
part of the aion (165).
Friday, February 13, 2015
Thought for the Day-worship part 12
Thought for the Day-worship part
12
Psalm 22:3 states, "But thou art holy, O thou
that inhabitest the praises of Israel."
The word inhabitest is translated from the Hebrew word yashab (3437) which
means to sit down with or to dwell among those who praise God. So, it is no joke that God will
"attend" our worship services if we truly worship Him.
The Role of Music in Worship-part 12
The Role
of Music in Worship-part 12
One of the many questions about worship is whether or not meeting
together to is really an ancient landmark of worshiping God. Did God ever say
that people need a place to worship and commune with him? In Exodus 25:8 it is
recorded that Jehovah commanded Moses, "And let them make me a sanctuary;
that I may dwell among them." Then Jehovah proceeded to outline in detail
the particulars of the construction of the Tabernacle of worship. God also
instructed Moses, in verse 22 of the same chapter, "And there I will
commune with thee from above the mercy seat, from between the two cherubims
which are upon the ark of the testimony, of all things which I will give thee
in commandment unto the children of Israel." The Tabernacle was what I
call a "beginning place" for the worship of Jehovah. Worship there was for an esoteric few and not
for everyone. We know that in the Tabernacle only a selected few were permitted
to perform the acts of worship in representation of the people. Later the
Temple was much more open to a type of public worship. Now everyone can attend.
We know of a surety that God desired to commune with ancient Israel, but
does He still desires for Christians in this dispensation to come together to
commune with him? Since we are God's temple isn't it better to sing and pray by
one's self? In Hebrews 10:24-25 we get a clear picture of the importance of
public worship. "And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and
to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the
manner of some is; but exhorting one another; and so much the more, as ye see
the day approaching." So the writer of the Epistle of Hebrews very
carefully explains the virtues of meeting together to worship God and build
each other up in our holy faith.
We are aware that each Christian is to privately worship God. Therefore,
some do not see the importance of public corporate worship. Those who discount
the necessity of public worship often quote Acts 7:48 and 17: 24 as proof texts
that God doesn't dwell in "temples made with hands". Although God
lives in our hearts rather than in church buildings, there is nothing about these
verses that would suggest that God does not meet with Christians when they come
to His house to worship Him.
Now you may legitimately ask what on earth does all this has to do with
music in worship? Good question! First, one of the ways that the Holy Spirit
was able to convict me of the awfulness of my sin that separated me from God
was watching a camp meeting choir at the Eastern Kansas Camp praise the Lord.
God uses the musicing of His people, to cause those who do not know him to
desire to have fellowship with God. Second, music is an excellent vehicle to
exhort believers to draw closer to our Heavenly father. Third, the emotions and
effusions of a worshiping heart can be expressed more clearly with music than
with “words alone". As Mike Avery, president of God's Bible College often
states, "Words break down and squeak" when we try to explain our
response to our loving Savior Jesus Christ. Musicing unto the blessed Trinity
often fills the gap when taking the journey from the natural to the supernatural
in our worship experiences.
Thursday, February 12, 2015
Thought for the Day-worship part 11
Thought
for the Day-worship part 11
Many Christians find it much easier to
present God their life as a dead sacrifice rather than a living one. A dead sacrifice is not capable of service in
God's kingdom (see Romans 12:1).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)