I Corinthians mentions singing with understanding; how can a Christian
musician music with understanding if music has no meaning?
Music of the Bible, Christian Music Philosophy, Church Music, Music Education, Christian Music Education
Thursday, February 13, 2014
Musical Sound Communicates Meaning Part 17
Musical
Sound Communicates Meaning Part 17
First, I contend that music does communicate meaning and
second, that the person who will receive
the greatest meaning from a particular music will, without doubt, be the person
who has the greatest understanding of that musical genre and ipso facto, its meaning,
import, understanding, communication, or message. Third, I will concede that constraints on
one’s understanding of a piece of music will affect the amount of meaning its
musical sounds will communicate to the performer and the listener.
The strong belief that musical sounds are a “mirror of
life” or an “imitation of reality” is as ancient as Plato and Aristotle—and so
are the various arguments against such a philosophical thesis. Thus, it is not
far-fetched for me to contend that musical sounds do have the potential to
affect the whole life of all who hear and perform them.
My belief, therefore, leads me to the conclusion that
those who have a thorough understanding of music that arouses physical
passions, such as rock music with its incessant driving forward propelling
directionality, will possibly receive more harm because they have the greatest
understanding of this music’s content and intent communicated through
sounds. This is not to say that music
sounds will not also have a negative influence on all who hear it. Because
sounds penetrate the mind and the emotions, this music will exert influence on
all who hear it.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Scripture for the Day-Music’s Meaning- Part 16
Scripture for the Day-Music’s
Meaning- Part 16
1Cointhians 14:15 “What is it then? I will pray with the spirit, and I
will pray with the understanding also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will
sing with the understanding also.”
Musical Sound Communicates Meaning Part 16
Musical
Sound Communicates Meaning Part 16
If musical sound was incapable of communicating understanding, then the music part of music would not have any value as a ministering tool. However, there is entirely too much evidence that music has the power to communicate “knowing” to the performer and the auditor for me to ever be convinced that musical sound is impotent and incapable of having any positive or negative influence.
Perhaps Roger Scruton’s statement should be considered at this point in our discussion of musical “knowing’ and “meaning”. He stated, “If music has meaning, then that meaning must be understood by the one who understands the music. Hence the concept of musical understanding displaces that of musical meaning: we have no idea what musical meaning might be, until we have some grasp of the distinction between the one who hears with understanding and the one who merely hears.” Understanding Music by Roger Scruton, p.34. He prefaced this statement by explaining, “The meaning of a sentence is what we understand when we understand it. Constraints on understanding are therefore constraints on meaning.” Ibid. p.34 It is a very dangerous thing to take one or two isolated statements of a music philosopher’s writings and suggest exactly what is meant by these statements. So, I will not attempt to lock down exactly all that he meant, but merely use these famous quotes as a springboard for discussion.
If musical sound was incapable of communicating understanding, then the music part of music would not have any value as a ministering tool. However, there is entirely too much evidence that music has the power to communicate “knowing” to the performer and the auditor for me to ever be convinced that musical sound is impotent and incapable of having any positive or negative influence.
Perhaps Roger Scruton’s statement should be considered at this point in our discussion of musical “knowing’ and “meaning”. He stated, “If music has meaning, then that meaning must be understood by the one who understands the music. Hence the concept of musical understanding displaces that of musical meaning: we have no idea what musical meaning might be, until we have some grasp of the distinction between the one who hears with understanding and the one who merely hears.” Understanding Music by Roger Scruton, p.34. He prefaced this statement by explaining, “The meaning of a sentence is what we understand when we understand it. Constraints on understanding are therefore constraints on meaning.” Ibid. p.34 It is a very dangerous thing to take one or two isolated statements of a music philosopher’s writings and suggest exactly what is meant by these statements. So, I will not attempt to lock down exactly all that he meant, but merely use these famous quotes as a springboard for discussion.
Tuesday, February 11, 2014
Thought for the Day-Music’s Meaning- Part 15
Thought for the Day-Music’s
Meaning- Part 15
If God was wise enough and powerful enough to speak music into existence,
then He is wise enough and caring enough to instruct us in how to music unto
Him.
Musical Sound Communicates Meaning Part 15
Musical
Sound Communicates Meaning Part 15
I have often mentioned in my philosophical writings the
importance of Colossians 1:16 which states, “For by him are all things created,
that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they
be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things are created
by him and for him.” There are two words
in this Scripture that are of great importance to our discussion. They are visible (horatos 3707) and invisible (aoratos 517).
When it comes to God’s creating music there is the
portion that one is able to see (horatos) and the portion that one cannot see
(aoratos). The musical score is a part
of music that one can see and musical sound is a part that one cannot see. Although the written part may communicate
meaning to the trained musician who is capable of audiating it [i.e. the
ability to see pitch, rhythm and harmony on the musical score and hear them in
one’s mind], it is the sounds that are what really matters to the rest of the
people who are incapable of audiating it in their minds. Music that is still on the page of the score,
if it doesn’t have words, may very well be considered to be to be neutral to
the non-musician. However, when sounds
are produced from that score they take on life and communicate meaning to
everyone who hears them
In Colossians 1:16 there is a list of things that were
created by the exceeding God (Theos 2316).
Among this list is the word exousia (1849) which, among other things,
means delegated influences. I believe
that the invisible part of music belongs to this category. Colossians 1:16 explains that all these
categories of creation were made by the exceeding God for the exceeding
God. I believe that God, in his creative
power, gave music the delegated authority to influence mankind with musical
sound. The composers, arrangers,
performers, and conductors have been given the delegated authority to influence
all those who hear them produce sound.
Because God always gives mankind a choice, all those who compose,
arrange, perform, and conduct music may influence others for good or evil with
the musical sounds that they produce. So, ipso facto musicians are able to
influence others with the message that a particular sound communicates to the
auditor.
Monday, February 10, 2014
Musical Sound Communicates Meaning Part 14
Musical
Sound Communicates Meaning Part 14
Although the use
of the musical reference in the fourteenth chapter of I Corinthians is in the
middle of another discussion, it is still a musical reference. Verse six explains that distinct speaking
brings about clear communication.
Likewise, verse seven explains that clear production of musical sounds brings
about a clear musical message or meaning.
Therefore, one may safely conclude that music is at least a
meta-language in that it communicates meaning in an analogous manner to
language. Musicians are cautioned by
this verse that clear production of musical tones will insure a clear message
much like clear language communicates an understandable message.
I want to make it clear that I am not saying that clearly
spoken language and clearly produced musical tones function exactly alike. As I said before they function
similarly. Therefore, I conclude that
music functions only as a meta-language.
The import of the use of this musical reference in I Corinthians 14:7 is
that clearly produced music can and does communicate meaning to the performer
and the auditor. Therefore, the music
part of music does matter because it communicates real understandable
meaning. A careful look at verse seven
reveals that the inspired Word of God teaches that music that gives a clear
distinction in its sounds has the potential to cause the performer and the
auditor to “know” i.e. gain information and meaning from the musical sounds.
If music was totally benign, knowledgably mute, sealed in
a “bubble”, and therefore helpless to communicate any meaning, the writer of
this first letter to the Corinthian Christians would not have used the Greek
word ginosko (1097) which means “to perceive” or “to understand”. As I said earlier in this discussion, music
alone (music without text) is not capable of communicating clearly like a
spoken known language, but it does have the power and ability to communicate
meaning—thus the term meta-language is applied here to music being able to “say
something” or communicate meaning.
Thought for the Day-Music’s Meaning- Part 14
Thought for the Day-Music’s
Meaning- Part 14
I have found over the years that the greatest problems in church music
are not caused by exactly where a minister of music draws the line musically,
but rather by music ministers who no longer draw any lines musically.
Sunday, February 9, 2014
Thought for the Day-Music’s Meaning- Part 13
Thought for the Day-Music’s
Meaning- Part 13
Just because God gives a
Christian musician a choice concerning how he or she musics unto Him, that
musician is not relieved from the responsibility of using music in a way that
will represent His moral nature and thereby bring honor to His name.
Musical Sound Communicates Meaning Part 13
Musical
Sound Communicates Meaning Part 13
As can be expected, Satan is always present in this dark
world to assist men and women in messing up God’s wonderful creation called
music. Any philosophical belief about
music that denies that God intends music for our good and that Satan intends to
pervert it to aid in our spiritual failure is simply a naive and over
simplistic misguided belief system. In
the Book of Genesis, it is stated very clearly that ALL of God’s creation,
which without doubt had to include music, was created in a very good (maod towb
3966, 2896) condition [see Genesis 1:31].
However, God always gives man a choice.
If man had not listened to Satan he would not have fallen from that
wonderful state where he walked and talked with God in the Garden of Eden [see Genesis
chapter three]. However, he did listen
to Satan, fell spiritually when he disobeyed God, and took on Satan’s sinful rebellious
nature. Since man has a choice today, he
can compose and arrange musical sounds that honor God or that feed the lust of
sinful men and women.
I Corinthians 14:7 states, “And even things without life
giving sound, whether pipe or harp,
except they give a distinction in
the sounds, how shall it be known what is piped or harped.” This Scripture has been subjected over the centuries
to a plethora of confusion of opinions concerning its meaning. We know that the Greek words translated
giving sound (didomi
phone-1325, 5456) mean something that yields sound. The words “give a distinction in the sounds”
(didomi diastole phthoggos 1325, 1293, 5353) mean to yield a distinction of
musical notes in the process of utterance of musical sounds.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)